Aller au contenu principal

RÉPONSES QNET

Disparaging information about QNET must be accurate because it’s in the Wikipedia entry.

We strongly dispute the credibility of the Wikipedia entry on QNET.  But we can’t do much about it as Wikipedia’s policy does not allow a company representative, a PR agency, or anyone with a stake in the matter to edit entries. We have lodged a complaint with Wikipedia administrators about the heavy bias of the entry and a debate has been opened on their ‘Neutral Point of View’ noticeboard.

Please also note that Wikipedia is not considered a reliably authentic source of information, which the site itself acknowledges. Wikipedia is a public forum where anyone, even you, can edit an entry. This means, while many of the entries are well-documented and checked for quality, they can still be manipulated to a point that the false information may be undetectable.

If you have questions about QNET, we suggest contacting the company directly.

Share This Article

Why is there scepticism around QNET’s Amezcua product range?

The skepticism around QNET’s Amezcua product range may stem from a lack of understanding of the science and research behind…

Do your energy products really work?

Yes, Amezcua’s energy products are really very effective. They are certified and absolutely safe. This is confirmed by the results…

How to use Bio Disc 3?

The Amezcua Bio Disc 3 can be used in several ways to enhance your wellbeing: 1. Place the Bio Disc…

How much are Amezcua products?

Amezcua’s products range between $150 to $670.

Rejoignez la chaîne
WhatsApp QNET Afrique !

WhatsApp 1